tg-me.com/mundoJS/4336
Last Update:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCxSsr5xuL8
BY Mundo JS
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/Zt6I_Rolai81ngsvx56UqDAItJs8YGJRyZHjacs0qVQy4zZ9zyhdGPnT7ho1k8uGBdarvnZW53LbD9mN_r_8xyg2VrIfubCk_hJVhEe7rXWDJiY0md99zeagRc364jaxLORB0QCKtlk75LV9-G4vnwLKd4SIPuZK6C_XFMWFQY_73g1YLj5Z-Kj_OcUohuxPSKsX1Q07YHiGkIU0cUlw7vYnmWL8Kg3Tipz8crDbo_RBAzXzRqAVHMzcqmysEQUEQ0r71toiQs9dt8mmx82yQQEC109SA4h5vSHSbhfu3VTKwbpviqztM_Xkn2rRz6kL6FZ9x8UOzGZnQt82KlpeMw.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/mundoJS/4336
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCxSsr5xuL8
BY Mundo JS
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
Mundo JS from nl